September 15 Changes (HHH)
--------------------------

----------------------------------------------------------------------
1.  Action:	Downgraded scope of "live" at the START
    From:	BadURL_WordStarts[i++]="live";
    To:		BadHostWordStarts[i++]="live";
    Reason:	There were just too many false positives in URLs.
		(see next one for some counts)

2.  Action:	Downgraded scope of "live" at the END
    From:	BadURL_WordEnds[i++]="live";
    To:		BadHostWordEnds[i++]="live";
		(also, the URL in the comment above it should be
		changed to HOST)  I think every place we say HOST or
		URL WE
    Reason:	There were just too many false positives in URLs.
		live at neither Start or End:	(497, 291, 222)
		live only at Start:		(497, 291, 120)
		live only at End:		(497, 291, 126)
		live at both Start and End:	(497, 291,  44)
----------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------------------------------------------------------
3.  Action:	Downgraded scope of "strip" at the START
    From:	BadURL_WordStarts[i++]="strip"
    To:		BadHostWordStarts[i++]="strip";
    Reason:	There were just too many false positives in URLs.
		(see next one for some counts)

4.  Action:	REMOVED "strip" FROM the END
    From:	BadURL_WordEnds[i++]="strip";
    To:		* NOTHING *
		strip at neither Start or End:	(105 / 50 / 50)
    Reason:	There were just too many false positives in URLs.
		strip at neither Start or End:	(105, 50, 50)
		strip only at Start:		(105, 50, 18)
		strip only at End:		(105, 50, 50)
		strip at both Start and End:	(105, 50, 18)
	I could have just downgraded strip at the end, but it isn't
	worth it.  It doesn't contribute anything to reducing hosts.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

5.  Action:	"sinful" rule added
    Rule:	BadURL_Parts[i++] = "sinful";
    Reason:	Handles 20 hosts, probably even more URLs.  I saw
		no reason why I could NOT apply it to an entire URL.
                It is usually at the start but why not go all the way?

6.  Action:     "3x" rule re-added
    Rule:       BadHostParts[i++] = "3x";
    Reason:     This is just an alias for "xxx"

7.  Action:	"free" rule added
    Rule:	BadHostParts[i++] = "free";
    Reason:	1,688 hosts made it past all of our rules.  Is that
		a good enough reason?  Here is the count before we
		added the rule:

		Parts removes:		3432
		Starts / Ends removes:	 588
		Passes:			1688
		----------------------------
		Total:			5708

		If people want a host with "free" in it then we are
		going to have to add some of them.  Either that or
		take a long hard look at rules to manage.